I have seen and treated patients in the Center for Nutrition and Wellness who have suffered some secondary effects of SARS-CoV-2, more commonly known as the COVID-19, resulting from infection and/or the side effects of the “vaccine.” These have included severe chills and uncontrollable shaking and hours of uncontrollable, daily diarrhea. It also includes long-term fatigue, which has also been a common side effect. Further, I have seen firsthand patients who have been diagnosed with myocarditis.
As we move along with research about both the virus itself and the “vaccine” created in response, we are beginning to better understand what happens to the body when it is exposed to Covid-19 infection or when it receives the current rMNA injections. One such area of study includes a serious, reported, “vaccine” side effect that involves swelling and inflammation of the heart and the lining of the heart. These two conditions are referred to as myocarditis and pericarditis respectively.
You see your heart is really just a specialized form of muscle, and its job is to contract and force oxygenated blood out through your arteries to feed all of your tissues. The heart also forces blood to the lungs to pick up oxygen in order to circulate back to the heart and then out to the tissues. Unfortunately, when these cardiac tissues become inflamed, they cause pain and altered function of the heart. Myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium or the cardiac muscle tissue. Pericarditis is inflammation in the surrounding tissue of the heart called the pericardium.
RELUCTANCE TO CALL IT A VACCINE
Before I share with you related research that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Cardiology specifically, I want to clear up a few facts on a very controversial subject. As we know, the Covid-19 “vaccine” was hastily developed and released onto the market to treat the SARS-CoV-2. As we have seen over the last few years, this “vaccine” does not function according to the historic definition of a vaccine.
In fact, on September 1, 2021, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention slightly altered the definition of vaccine and vaccination on the Immunization Basics page of its website. The new language better fits the CDC’s narrative of what they hope the “SARS-CoV-2 vaccine” could accomplish. Any reference to the words “produce immunity” was removed and replaced with “produce protection from.” This is because, as history has shown, the Covid-19 “vaccine” clearly does not make one immune to the disease.
The historical definition of a vaccine meant that the drug would interact with your own immune system and your body would form antibodies against that specific virus and prevent you from acquiring the condition that the vaccine was designed for. Historically, patients would receive either a partially or completely killed virus, which in turn would cause your body’s immune system to kick into gear and start producing antibodies against the invading virus.
In the instance of the SARS-CoV-2 “vaccine,” the injection was composed of genetic material from the spike protein of the virus, the “novel” or unique component of this coronavirus. This was used as the antigen or invading part of the virus. Unlike conventional vaccines, this genetic material, called m-RNA, would enter the cells of the body and cause a genetically induced process causing multiple replications of the spike protein in virtually all cells in the recipient’s body. The intent was to allow the spike proteins generated by the cells to circulate in the body and thereby stimulate the production of antibodies against that component of the “novel coronavirus” that caused COVID-19 infection (a.k.a. the spike protein).
On the face, this may sound good. It certainly was a much less expensive and significantly faster way to produce this form of “vaccine”. But, as with all drugs, there is always a secondary or side effect.
CARDIAC STUDY
In the case of this COVID “vaccine,” there have been multiple side effects reported. They include localized swelling and redness at the site of injection, which is not an uncommon side effect induced by other vaccines. This particular side effect is not significantly debilitating for most individuals. However, there are also much more severe and long-lasting side effects. These more severe side effects include many reported neurologic and cardiac conditions.
Research published in Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Cardiology specifically focused on the incidence of one specific cardiac issue in relationship to the SARS CoV-2 “vaccine.” The population studied included 23 million residents of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. The stated purpose of the research was to evaluate the “vaccine” related risks of specifically developing myocarditis.
The study took into consideration the “vaccine” product, the “vaccine” dose, the sex, and age of the individuals in the study. All participants were 12 years old or older. They were studied from December of 2020 until the incident of myocarditis or pericarditis. The study period ended in October of 2021.
The researchers compared the incidence rates of pericarditis and myocarditis in the 28-day period following vaccination with the rates among unvaccinated individuals. The study followed 23,122,522 individuals, 81% of whom were vaccinated. By the end of the study, 1077 had an incident of myocarditis, and 1149 were diagnosed with pericarditis. Of note, was that the second dose of “vaccine” was associated with a higher risk of myocarditis. According to the researchers the higher incidence of pericarditis was similar following the second dose.
In conclusion, the study’s authors noted that both the first and second doses of m-RNA “vaccines” were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. They went on to note that for individuals receiving two doses of the same vaccine, the risk of myocarditis was the highest among young males aged 16 to 24 after the second dose.
Only time and further study will show what we did correctly following the outbreak of this previously never-experienced coronavirus and also what we did that was totally wrong. And as the study concludes, “the risk of myocarditis associated with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 must be balanced against the benefits of these 'vaccines.'”
Everyone’s personal situation dictates whether there is an actual benefit or not. Your decision to use this and future "vaccines" created in a similar way using genetic material should be left up to you. Remember, it is your body and you have the responsibility to care for and protect it. No one else will care as much about your health and wellness except your mother perhaps, so choose wisely please.